Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters

نویسندگان

  • Mehrnaz Hadian
  • Hyung Kook Kim
  • Donald A Severyn
  • Michael R Pinsky
چکیده

INTRODUCTION Although less invasive than pulmonary artery catheters (PACs), arterial pulse pressure analysis techniques for estimating cardiac output (CO) have not been simultaneously compared to PAC bolus thermodilution CO (COtd) or continuous CO (CCO) devices. METHODS We compared the accuracy, bias and trending ability of LiDCO™, PiCCO™ and FloTrac™ with PACs (COtd, CCO) to simultaneously track CO in a prospective observational study in 17 postoperative cardiac surgery patients for the first 4 hours following intensive care unit admission. Fifty-five paired simultaneous quadruple CO measurements were made before and after therapeutic interventions (volume, vasopressor/dilator, and inotrope). RESULTS Mean CO values for PAC, LiDCO, PiCCO and FloTrac were similar (5.6 ± 1.5, 5.4 ± 1.6, 5.4 ± 1.5 and 6.1 ± 1.9 L/min, respectively). The mean CO bias by each paired method was -0.18 (PAC-LiDCO), 0.24 (PAC-PiCCO), -0.43 (PAC-FloTrac), 0.06 (LiDCO-PiCCO), -0.63 (LiDCO-FloTrac) and -0.67 L/min (PiCCO-FloTrac), with limits of agreement (1.96 standard deviation, 95% confidence interval) of ± 1.56, ± 2.22, ± 3.37, ± 2.03, ± 2.97 and ± 3.44 L/min, respectively. The instantaneous directional changes between any paired CO measurements displayed 74% (PAC-LiDCO), 72% (PAC-PiCCO), 59% (PAC-FloTrac), 70% (LiDCO-PiCCO), 71% (LiDCO-FloTrac) and 63% (PiCCO-FloTrac) concordance, but poor correlation (r(2) = 0.36, 0.11, 0.08, 0.20, 0.23 and 0.11, respectively). For mean CO < 5 L/min measured by each paired devices, the bias decreased slightly. CONCLUSIONS Although PAC (COTD/CCO), FloTrac, LiDCO and PiCCO display similar mean CO values, they often trend differently in response to therapy and show different interdevice agreement. In the clinically relevant low CO range (< 5 L/min), agreement improved slightly. Thus, utility and validation studies using only one CO device may potentially not be extrapolated to equivalency of using another similar device.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Pulse contour analysis: Is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient?

Three pulse contour systems for monitoring cardiac output - LiDCO Plus™, PiCCO Plus™ and FloTrac™ - were compared in postcardiac surgery patients. None of the three methods demonstrated good trending ability according to concordance analysis. Pulse contour systems remain unreliable in the haemodynamically unstable patient.

متن کامل

Use of minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring to assess dynamic changes in cardiac output at the bedside

[1] on our recent pulse contour analysis study [2]. We disagree with his statement that, based on our data, one cannot use arterial pulse contour to assess changes in cardiac output (CO). We compared several commercially available arterial pulse contour methods of measuring CO with themselves and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)-derived bolus thermodilution (COtd) and continuous CO (CCO) modes. ...

متن کامل

Semi-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement Based on Pulse Contour: A Review.

Different methods exist to continuously measure cardiac output by minimally invasive means, most of them based on arterial pulse contour analysis like FloTrac/Vigileo, PiCCO, LiDCO/PulseCO, PRAM and Modelflow. 90 comparative studies between these devices and the accepted reference method, pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution, were included in our analysis. The majority of studies show accep...

متن کامل

Comparison of the accuracy of the lithium dilution technique with the thermodilution technique for measurement of cardiac output.

A new indicator dilution technique for measurement of cardiac output is described. Lithium chloride is injected via a central venous catheter and its dilution curve measured in arterial blood using a lithium-selective electrode. We assessed the lithium dilution cardiac output measurement (LiDCO) and a conventional thermodilution cardiac output measurement (ThDCO) by comparing the results of bot...

متن کامل

A new method of measuring cardiac output in man using lithium dilution.

We describe a new indicator dilution method of measuring cardiac output in man. A bolus injection of lithium chloride 0.6 mmol was given via a central venous catheter and arterial plasma [Li+] recorded using a specially developed sensor incorporating an Li(+)-selective electrode. Cardiac output was derived from the lithium dilution curve, with a correction for packed cell volume. Lithium diluti...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 14  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010